https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850
gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
Issues:
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
[!]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[!]: Test suite of the library should be run.
[!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %exclude %{gem_cache},
%{gem_libdir}
NON blocking issues:
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD (2 clause) MIT/X11 (BSD like)".
237 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/gil/1368850-rubygem-rouge/licensecheck.txt
All source files without license headers:
Please, report to upstream
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
Please, add also License file in doc sub package
Please, fix before import
Approved
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
