https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #25 from Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #24)
> You're going to need to adjust the license tag on this package.
> Licensecheck found several licenses other than Apache in parts of the code
> base:
>
> GPL (v3 or later)
> -----------------
> libphutil-8f8e02d47569dce5f035383d8bcbf7a08481e839/support/xhpast/parser.
> yacc.cpp
> libphutil-8f8e02d47569dce5f035383d8bcbf7a08481e839/support/xhpast/parser.
> yacc.hpp
Bah, I thought those were covered under the special GPL exception for bison
output but I missed the part about "as long as it isn't used as part of a
parser generator'.
> MIT/X11 (BSD like)
> ------------------
> libphutil-8f8e02d47569dce5f035383d8bcbf7a08481e839/externals/jsonlint/LICENSE
Why couldn't this be distributed as APL2? Ignoring the GPL3 issue with the
bison output, I mean.
> You should also set the Version: tag to 0 and the Release: tag to
> 0.1.20160806.git%{git_short_version_hash}%{dist}
>
> If you were to do a second build with that same git hash, it would then be
> 0.2.20160806.git%{git_short_version_hash}%{dist}, and so on.
>
> This way, if/when a version 1.0 comes out, it will be greater than version
> 0.x.2016whatever.
That makes sense but I'm going to see if I can get more out of Jeroen WRT the
potential requires/provides issue he mentioned. I'm not sure if that's been
tested at all or if there was a plan to work around the concerns.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
