https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #2)
> 3 questions:
> - Does it make sense to install the javadoc without the actual package -
> Missing "Require:"?
No
> [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ed25519
> -java-javadoc
Requires are handled by our: java(packages-)tools
and this is a noarch package. for refrerences see:
https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/#maven
> [?]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
> when building with ant
> - pom.xml isn't packaged, why?
is not true see "Provides" mvn(net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:pom:)
> [?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> - There seem to be tests in test/net/i2p/crypto/eddsa, but no %check
This is a maven build style and "%check" is useless only in this case (and with
gradle)
> Requires
> --------
> ed25519-java (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> java-headless
> javapackages-tools
>
> ed25519-java-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> javapackages-tools
>
>
>
> Provides
> --------
> ed25519-java:
> ed25519-java
> mvn(net.i2p.crypto:eddsa)
> mvn(net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:pom:)
> osgi(net.i2p.crypto.eddsa)
>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
