https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
--- Comment #6 from Björn "besser82" Esser <fed...@besser82.io> --- (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #5) > Some initial remarks, before going into the review: > > - I see all sorts of licenses in the code: Apache, BSD, GPLv3, MIT... can > you review this? The LGPLv3 for everything doesn't seem OK. > - Here seems to be some bundled, minified javascript libraries such as > react. Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript. > > Here is also things like (./odoo/addons/l10n_cr/__init__.py:) Yeah, I found a lot of stuff to unbundle: fonts, js, python-code :/ > At top; > # Part of Odoo. See LICENSE file for full copyright and licensing details. > > line 8-9 > # First author: Carlos Vásquez <carlos.vasq...@clearcorp.co.cr> > (ClearCorp S.A.) > # Copyright (c) 2010-TODAY ClearCorp S.A. (http://clearcorp.co.cr). All > rights reserved > > To me, this doesn't make sense. It looks like the author has claimed all > rights, and published under a MIT license. And then odoo has pasted there > own license on top, more or less hijacking the code. I am not a lawyer, but > this looks fishy. Thoughts? For the MIT-License it is fine this way, since this license explicitly allows relicensing / sublicensing. See fulltext: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
