https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202470

Antti Järvinen <antti.jarvi...@katiska.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |antti.jarvi...@katiska.org
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #15 from Antti Järvinen <antti.jarvi...@katiska.org> ---
Well, 

upstream source code anyway gets distributed in source rpm was it used in
resulting binary rpm or not - it too needs to comply with the license. Anyway,
those files I was querying about are part of upstream package and they
distribute LICENSE.txt mentioning mozilla foundation ; lets trust the upstream. 

If the hg commit 42d7aef60138 really is 1.4 then the versioning is all right. I
still don't get it why Source0: points to commit and not to release 1.4 - never
used mercurial myself so there must be something about download URLs that I'm
missing. 

-> I'm setting this as "pass", thank you for submitting software for review. 

--
Antti

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to