https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #33 from Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> ---
>Should I just excludearch them as well?
No.
I thought you wanted to compile on epel, too.
The review is almost done:
- Your are not using %license to pack the license files.
- You should use %doc or %_pkgdocdir macros for documentation, not
%{_docdir}/Elemental
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation):
$ rpm --eval %_pkgdocdir
%{_docdir}/%{name}
- 'elemental-common' provides arch-independent files, so it is a 'noarch'
package.
Please, modify in this sense
%package common
Summary: Files in common between mpich and openmpi
Group: Development/Libraries
BuildArch: noarch <---
Requires: qt5-qtbase
%description common
Files not specific to mpich or openmpi
Consequently, other packages which require 'elemental-common' use the line
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
(without '%{?_isa}')
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
