https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsult...@outlook.com> --- Hi Petr, Thank you for taking the time to produce such a thorough review. This will definitely help me write better specfiles moving forward. It will take me a bit to go through all of these in finer detail, but you can expect these all to get fixed. Thanks for the heads up regarding the tangerine tool. I was wondering if there was good way to know exactly what packages are needed when performing a perl test during the build. My apologies for leaving %debug_package macro in there. That was a quick fix to allow the build to succeed... before I discovered the root cause was really a missing "BuildArch: noarch". The summary & License text came directly from cpanspec Astro::SunTime But I will certainly change either if they aren't right. I get it. cpanspec is just a program, which makes some best-guess assumptions. We need to be smarter than that. I'll contact the author of the perl module about the missing license text immediately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
