https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Christian Dersch <lupi...@mailbox.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch <lupi...@mailbox.org> ---
Approved, thank you very much for packaging this! Very useful for me as I'll
use dnfdragora for LXQt spin. Feel free to add me as a comaintainer for this
and the new libyui packages if you wish.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/review/review-
dnfdragora/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/pa_IN/LC_MESSAGES,
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages, /usr/share/locale/pa_IN,
/usr/lib/python3.6
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.6/site-
packages, /usr/share/locale/pa_IN/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.6,
/usr/share/locale/pa_IN
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
contains icons.
Note: icons in dnfdragora
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.1.gitcc4e556.20170202.fc26.noarch.rpm
dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.1.gitcc4e556.20170202.fc26.src.rpm
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libYui -> Libby
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted,
front end, front-end
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rpmdragora ->
Protagoras
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rpmdrake -> rpm
drake, rpm-drake, mandrake
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libYui -> Libby
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses -> nurses,
curses, n curses
dnfdragora.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libYui -> Libby
dnfdragora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted,
front end, front-end
dnfdragora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rpmdragora ->
Protagoras
dnfdragora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rpmdrake -> rpm drake,
rpm-drake, mandrake
dnfdragora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libYui -> Libby
dnfdragora.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses -> nurses,
curses, n curses
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libYui -> Libby
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted,
front end, front-end
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rpmdragora ->
Protagoras
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rpmdrake -> rpm
drake, rpm-drake, mandrake
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libYui -> Libby
dnfdragora.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ncurses -> nurses,
curses, n curses
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Requires
--------
dnfdragora (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/python3
config(dnfdragora)
dnf
filesystem
hicolor-icon-theme
python(abi)
python3-PyYAML
python3-dnfdaemon
python3-yui
Provides
--------
dnfdragora:
appdata()
appdata(org.mageia.dnfdragora.appdata.xml)
application()
application(org.mageia.dnfdragora.desktop)
config(dnfdragora)
dnfdragora
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/manatools/dnfdragora/archive/cc4e556959c68817c1d0ca8728fd140dfe6785c6.tar.gz#/dnfdragora-0.0.0-gitcc4e556.20170202.tar.gz
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
6883af3eb20f1b94963de3795d349c55959fd34523bf1b1b2b3e860ef5bdb5c3
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
6883af3eb20f1b94963de3795d349c55959fd34523bf1b1b2b3e860ef5bdb5c3
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -L rpm_deps_dnfdragora/ -m
fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -n dnfdragora
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl,
Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Built with local dependencies:
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-gtk-devel-1.0.1-0.1.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc26.x86_64.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-gtk-1.0.1-0.1.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc26.x86_64.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-debuginfo-1.0.8-0.1.gita6a160e.20160313.fc26.x86_64.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-gtk-doc-1.0.1-0.1.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc26.noarch.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-doc-1.0.8-0.1.gita6a160e.20160313.fc26.noarch.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-1.0.8-0.1.gita6a160e.20160313.fc26.x86_64.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-gtk-debuginfo-1.0.1-0.1.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc26.x86_64.rpm
/home/review/rpm_deps_dnfdragora/libyui-mga-devel-1.0.8-0.1.gita6a160e.20160313.fc26.x86_64.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
