Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636892 Marcela Mašláňová <mmasl...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |mmasl...@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmasl...@redhat.com> 2010-09-23 12:29:09 EDT --- - rpmlint checks return: a lot of rubbish. That's ok because rpmlint wasn't still fixed. - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license ( GPL+ or Artistic) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK - spec file legible, in am. english OK - source matches upstream OK - package compiles on devel (x86) OK - no missing BR OK - no unnecessary BR OK - no locales OK - not relocatable OK - owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - macro use consistent OK - code, not content OK - no need for -docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - no need for .desktop file OK No problem with package. Only in perl core needs to be created sub-package first for correct update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
