https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438881
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #8) > Just a note that unless this package contains version 22 of guile, the > naming guidelines indicate that "guile2.2" is the correct name: > > " > [...] All other packages derived from it MUST include the base name suffixed > by either: > > * The package version, which SHOULD include the periods present in the > original version. > [...] > > The idea is to avoid the confusion between version 2.2 and version 22. Good point. FWIW, I prefer guile22 to keep the naming consistent with compat-guile18. There are other packages not using dots and I think it's very unlikely we would have guile-2.2 and guile-22 packaged in Fedora at the same time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
