Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362 --- Comment #2 from BJ Dierkes <wdier...@rackspace.com> 2010-09-28 17:58:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why the Conflict with mod_python? At least it needs to documented > why it conflicts in the .spec file if it actually does. This may have been an assumed conflict, and is how most packages are handled in IUS (where this is porting from). I've removed it, and will test mod_python/mod_python26 together. > /var/www/manual/mod/mod_python can presumably be moved with some > corresponding edits in the mod_python26.conf. This is actually already being done in the spec/config. > > And also: > > Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing) > > Seems a bit odd, can you explain? This was inherited from the Fedora packages which do the same thing. It makes the package require the version of http-mmn that it is built against (httpd provides httpd-mmn). I.e.: $ rpm -q --provides httpd | grep -i mmn httpd-mmn = 20051115 Updated spec/srpm (I'll need to test mod_python/mod_python26 together though): Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mod_python26.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mod_python26-3.3.1-12.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
