https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169926
Raphael Groner <projects...@smart.ms> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |projects...@smart.ms
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner <projects...@smart.ms> ---
IMHO it's better to build a package of Jiab77/systemd-zram instead, that
project [1] has nearly the same code base and particularly a proper and valid
licensing as MIT with full license text [2].
Although your spec file as well the upstream spec file say it's GPLv2, we can
not verify the requirement [3] to ship the license text. You could point
upstream to include license as headers [4] into their shell scripts.
[1] https://github.com/Jiab77/systemd-zram
[2] https://github.com/Jiab77/systemd-zram/blob/master/LICENSE
[3] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#WhyMustIInclude
[4] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#NoticeInSourceFile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
