https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Ruzicka <jruzi...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10) > > The Python 3 support is rather fresh and not well tested. Furthermore, > > python3-bunch isn't available. I'll switch python3-rdopkg to provide rdopkg > > as soon as I'm confident in py3 support (in rdopkg and in EL). > > If there's a missing dependency, I'd rather block rdopkg from being included > period. In addition, your current scheme does not allow for a seamless > transition from Python 2 to Python 3 for rdopkg because in order to switch > it, you'd have to obsolete the python2 version, which may not necessarily > work. I would suggest splitting out /usr/bin/rdopkg into an rdopkg > subpackage that Requires the python2 or python3 version depending on what > you prefer. Good suggestion, will do. > For the "optional but recommended" thing, please use Recommends for Fedora. > If it's not a hard dependency, don't make it one. I wanted to wait until it's supported in latest EL to avoid %if but OK, I'll pave the way ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
