https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #8 from Philip Kovacs <pkde...@yahoo.com> --- After a discussion on an upstream forum, it's clear to me now that adding a dedicated slurm user with a static uid is not the best approach for this package. We don't to make incorrect assumptions about how installations will manage their users and slurm clusters are often managed with ldap-type tools. End-users of slurm must also have consistent uids on all nodes, so installers will likely turn to ldap/nis, etc. anyway to create a working system. I am going to alter the rpm spec to remove the slurm user creation, install for root, and leave the user-management issues to the installers. I will also add a "bonus" script for Fedora that eases the ownership change of a node to whatever user/group the installer wants after installation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
