https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490054
--- Comment #29 from Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #28) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27) > > Issues: > > ======= > > - Package does not use a name that already exists. > > Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/scidavis > > See: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ > > NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names > > > > This is review is considered as an "unorphaning" process. > > > > - update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package > > contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. > > Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in scidavis > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop- > > database > > > > No longer used on Fedora. > > Nothing to do here, right? Yes. > > > GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ are compatible licenses; you can use GPLv3+ as resultant > > license. > > Really??? It always seemed logical, but since I am not proficient in > legalese I didn't question it. Do you want me to update the spec, or should > I leave it for the next build? Update, please. > > > [?]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > > Note: Directories without known owners: > > /usr/share/icons/locolor/16x16, /usr/share/icons/locolor/32x32/apps, > > /usr/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps, /usr/share/mime, > > /usr/share/mime/packages, /usr/share/icons/locolor, > > /usr/share/icons/locolor/32x32, /usr/share/icons/locolor/22x22, > > /usr/share/icons/locolor/22x22/apps > > > > '/usr/share/icons/locolor' looks not owned by any package. > > I think you can permit 'scidavis' owns it, use: > > > > %dir %{_datadir}/icons/locolor > > On my system, I see a bunch of icons under /usr/share/icons/locolor, > belonging to libreoffice, kimagemapeditor, krename and kxsldbg. I don't > think scidavis should take ownership… > > Fine. '/usr/share/icons/locolor' is owned by kde-filesystem; this means that we need install 'scidavis' and 'kde-filesystem' together. > > > Rpmlint > > ------- > > Checking: scidavis-1.21-4.fc28.x86_64.rpm > > python2-scidavis-1.21-4.fc28.x86_64.rpm > > scidavis-debuginfo-1.21-4.fc28.x86_64.rpm > > scidavis-1.21-4.fc28.src.rpm > > scidavis.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scriptability -> > > script ability, script-ability, inscrutability > > scidavis.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US extensibility -> > > sensibility, extensible > > python2-scidavis.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > python2-scidavis.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > scidavis-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id) > > Are these errors because rpmlint hasn't caught up with the system wide > debugging changes, or have I messed up something? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489096 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
