Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #12 from Takanori MATSUURA <t.mat...@gmail.com> 2010-10-13 06:23:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/NearTree/NearTree.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/NearTree/NearTree-2.3.1-0.src.rpm Update to 2.1.3. I have proposed patch 0 to the upstream. However he does not accept the change from "-shared" to "-rdynamic". Without patch 0, the build for 5E-epel x86_64 is failed by R_X86_64_32 issue. So I added patch 0 anyway. I have no idea why he does not accept because build manner is the same as CQRlib after applying the patch. Both I and he hope that the software compiles/works as many architecture as possible. However his choice is different from I (and many developers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
