Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584 --- Comment #20 from Ratnadeep Debnath <rtn...@gmail.com> 2010-10-15 03:03:04 EDT --- SPEC Url : http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/wordgroupz.spec SRPM url: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/wordgroupz-0.3-3.fc13.src.rpm I have updated wordgroupz code a bit. I got rid of the python-nltk dependency. I extracted only the code required for accessing wordnet dictionary from python-nltk. So will this new update be considered as a post release? In the Naming Guidelines, the naming format of post releases is given to be %{X}.%{posttag}. But if I change the wordgroupz version number from 0.3 to 0.3.1, then do I still require postag? Or will %{release-number}%{?dist} will suffice for the Release field? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
