https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518262
Peter Oliver <ma...@mavit.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ma...@mavit.org.uk
--- Comment #15 from Peter Oliver <ma...@mavit.org.uk> ---
(In reply to Zuzana Svetlikova from comment #4)
> > Also, I don't know of any conflicts that exist for "%{_bindir}/yarnpkg".
>
> I wanted some consistency, so I renamed both yarn and yarnpkg.
yarnpkg is an alias to yarn. Presumably, the reason that this alias exists is
to provide a consistent name in places where yarn is already taken by something
else, as is the case here.
Consequently, I think it would be best to leave yarnpkg at /usr/bin/yarnpkg.
If this were so, I can't see any reason why anyone would want to use
Fedora-specific /usr/bin/nodejs-yarn in preference to works-everywhere
/usr/bin/yarnpkg, so it would probably be reasonable to leave
/usr/bin/nodejs-yarn unpackaged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
