https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #74 from Yaakov Selkowitz <yselk...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #72) > You are not changing anything to the copyright if the patent is expunged > from the library. So, the library still has to be considered as non-floss > The uncertainty about the license condition would still apply. What uncertainty? RH Legal has already cleared the license. > Now about RPM Fusion. We have a non-replacement policy for fedora packages > in our default enabled repositories. So if you still decide to introduce > this broken package (both legally and technically), then we will move our > fdk-aac to a side repository that will need to be explicitly enabled. No, the intended solution would be to add an ld.so.conf.d-managed fdk-aac-freeworld similar to that of freetype-freeworld and qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld. > The point is. If the goal was to restore the support relying on the external > repository policy. Why just not only to rely on it in the first step and > drop the fedora fdk-aac package ? The goal is to get as much as we possibly can into Fedora itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
