https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576413
--- Comment #36 from Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Marian Csontos from comment #35)
> We must be looking at different yum.spec files, as the one I have opened has
> everything in the package %{name}.lang, including %config, launcher, and
> python modules.
>
> I think dnf is the closest to what you have proposed and fitting boom, but
> IMHO that split is partially driven by having support for both python2 and
> python3, and in our case does not make that much sense.
>
> Also main package in dnf is only the launcher (and man page and
> bash-completion), this requiring either python2 or python3 module, and both
> those modules require the common conf subpackage - so conf is required by
> python module, and not the other way.
>
> May be antipattern was not the best choice. But in this case that pattern
> does not fit - the configuration is required by python module, so should be
> either included, or python module should require the configuration
> subpackage, just like dnf does.
>
> Big thanks for all your time!
I just think that it's "surprising" for people and they're not likely to find
the boom boot manager if it's called "python3-boom". Our rules say python
modules that other people are supposed to be able to use should be
`python3-<foo>`, but they are specifically silent on what you should do with
the rest of it.
Whatever...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3MV3SF6SNCNSRPQ5GN2OTKFMT5WVNDJ3/
