https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824
--- Comment #10 from Luis Segundo <l...@blackfile.net> ---
(In reply to Casper Meijn from comment #9)
> The "LICENSE.txt" is not the license under which we want to use the
> software. Is it then still necessary to include it?
I understand, if the license does not apply, it can be removed.
> I replaced %{_datarootdir} by %{_datadir}.
Nice!
please check this last issue
Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file license.cpp is not marked as %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
