Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603481 --- Comment #26 from Christoph Wickert <cwick...@fedoraproject.org> 2010-11-07 08:49:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) > I get 1e64... for > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/freerdp/freerdp-0.8.1.tar.gz > no matter what I do. How/where do you get 8a26...? I used spectool and the result I got was indeed 8a26... Must have been a bad download. I have tried 3 times and always got 1e64... > AFAICS the following says that new packages shouldn't require it explicitly. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PkgconfigAutoRequires) That page is still a draft and it only says that *do*not*need* it but not that you *should*not require it. As it is stil required for EPEL 4 and 5 and someone already indicated he wants to maintain this for EPEL, I suggest to add it. Anyway, not a blocker, please go ahead with the SCM admin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
