https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #18 from Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Petra Alice Mikova from comment #17) > (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #15) > > (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14) > > > One expect digit in the middle. > > > > I'm curious: What expects it? A human? Some tooling? > > Some of our tools expect it (at least jsf definitely does), but I would not > say that is a dealbreaker, I can fix that one. > > I am no expert in this area, so I don't know how many things could it break, > but I like the "latest" idea, it would be less confusing imho, for users, > than having 2x java-xy-openjdk when lts comes, since I would expect, if I > hadn't know this, to have same dir as package name. The rolling suffix is > much easier to miss, than different dir name. The version is mentioned there > in both cases, so I don't mind. > > I can change this easily, so just tell me if I should change it. I don't fully understand comment 16 from Jiri. Perhaps he means this change would need alternatives adjustment and/or javapackages-tools coordination. Either way, we should investigate this and make a conscious decision. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
