https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |POST
CC| |zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> ---
Use %autosetup in build?
Should the .pc file be also included?
Should the package be called -headers or -devel?
+ package name is acceptable
+ license is acceptable for Fedora (MIT)
+ license is specified correctly
+ builds and installs OK
+ BR/R/P look OK
Package is APPROVED.
I think this looks OK, so I'll set the flag, but is the package really needed?
Maybe it'd
be easier and simpler and more effiecient to just copy those few files into the
xorg-x11-drv-armada package? Are any other users likely?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
