https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924



--- Comment #10 from Dan HorĂ¡k <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Steven Jay Munroe from comment #9)
> > pveclib.src: W: invalid-license APACHE
> 
> So you want this spelled out as "Apache Software License 2.0" or the short
> form "ASL 2.0" ?

should be the short name from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses

> > pveclib.ppc64le: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information 
> > /usr/lib64/libpvec.so.0.0.0
> 
> The current build only uses the static libraries for some unit tests. As is
> these libraries only contains arrays of large numeric constants. But this
> might change in later pveclib version are more complex operations are added.
> 
> > pveclib.ppc64le: W: dangling-relative-symlink 
> > /usr/share/licenses/pveclib/COPYING LICENSE
> 
> looks like I am caught on the horns of the "LICENSE" vs "COPYING"
> controversy: 
> 
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678462/should-i-provide-a-license-txt-
> or-copying-txt-file-in-my-project
> 
> The symlink avoids duplicating the file. While preserving COPYING for lint
> checks that insist on that file is there.
> 
> Not sure why it is "dangling" because it is used in Makefile.am
> 
> +dist_license_DATA = COPYING
> 
> +dist_doc_DATA = CONTRIBUTING.md README.md ChangeLog.md
> 
> Based on  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536209 I assumed this
> is what you (Fedora) wanted.

AFAIK it's OK to have the license text part of the autotools "docs" and then
the rpmbuild will care about the details in the background when %license and
%doc tags are used in the spec.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to