https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924
--- Comment #22 from Steven Jay Munroe <munroes...@gmail.com> --- So here is a cleaner build on COPR using the latest master with a temporary tag v1.0.2y. https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/munroesj52/pveclib/fedora-30-ppc64le/00978483-pveclib/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/munroesj52/pveclib/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le/00978483-pveclib/ Turns out the build process is really picked about all the version #s matching. And having pveclib.spec in the source tree is a mistake. Now the rpmlint is clean expect the spelling of altivec.h: $ rpmlint ./rpmbuild/ pveclib.ppc64le: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US altivec -> elective pveclib.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US altivec -> elective 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. one weird thing is that the RPMS built by COPR have bad signatures Error checking signature of /home/sjmunroe/rpmtest/pveclib-debuginfo-1.0.2y-1.fc30.ppc64le.rpm: /home/sjmunroe/rpmtest/pveclib-debuginfo-1.0.2y-1.fc30.ppc64le.rpm: digests SIGNATURES NOT OK rpm -ql complains: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 81dc7181: NOKEY But the ones I build on Fedora 30 P8 does NOT have these errors. I have no idea what this is oe how to deal with this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
