https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šplíchal <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2) > I'm surprised by the complexity of the %bcond options. > > What's the point of the Python 2 subpackage on Fedora 29? Unfortunately we still have a couple of tools in process of migration to Python 3 so the Python 2 subpackage is necessary. Hopefully soon we'll have everything Python 3 only and the spec file will become much more simple. > What's the point of using %{python3_pkgversion} if your are not > shipping Python 3 subpackage in EL < 8? Well, this spec is basically an updated copy of the spec we've put together for fmf: https://github.com/psss/fmf/commit/2d35fe5 So the %{python3_pkgversion} is not needed any more? If you see anything which can be simplified I'm definitely open to make it more readable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
