Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635511 --- Comment #18 from Rich Mattes <richmat...@gmail.com> 2010-11-17 15:02:47 EST --- If I'm reading the results from comment 15 right, glibc's atof() is faster than both Irrlicht's and Assimp's anyway? Maybe I should just patch Assimp to use the system atof in Linux... I think the errors might result from a #define hidden in the Assimp version of the fast_atof, namely #define AI_FAST_ATOF_RELAVANT_DECIMALS 6. It looks like that dictates how many decimal points to pay attention to before giving up and returning. Setting it to something like 10 or 15 (the max value) might improve the results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
