Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648986 --- Comment #5 from Jiri Popelka <jpope...@redhat.com> 2010-11-18 09:25:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, let's wait for Tim's reply (here and in bug #648987). > > The main point here is the exception: 'If the upstream source has "py" (or > "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. So, for example, > pygtk is acceptable.' [In this case the upstream tarballs are named "pycups" > and "pysmbc".] >From my point of view the main point here is that you *can* use that (upstream) name. There's no 'should' or 'strong suggestion'. The paragraph says: " They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script. " We use 'import cups' and 'import smbc' in Python scripts which gives me a python-cups and python-smbc package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
