https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783675

            Bug ID: 1783675
           Summary: Review Request: rust-alloc-no-stdlib - Dynamic
                    allocator that may be used with or without the stdlib
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: POST
         Component: Package Review
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
        QA Contact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected],
                    [email protected]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora
            Status: POST
                CC: [email protected]
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
             Flags: fedora-review+



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-alloc-no-stdlib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-alloc-no-stdlib-2.0.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
Description:
Dynamic allocator that may be used with or without the stdlib. This allows a
package with nostd to allocate memory dynamically and be used either with a
custom allocator, items on the stack, or by a package that wishes to simply use
Box<>. It also provides options to use calloc or a mutable global variable for
pre-zeroed memory.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

--- Comment #1 from Robert-AndrĂ© Mauchin <[email protected]> ---
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to