https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
--- Comment #4 from Nikola Forró <nfo...@redhat.com> ---
> This spec file was generated with go2rpm.
I'm aware, but that doesn't make any of my points invalid.
In fact, go2rpm on my end generates: "Release: 1%{?dist}"
> However, I found interesting the fact that we already have a ccat.
> I need to see how to procedure in this case.
You can rename the binary, or you can convince ccrypt to rename theirs (perhaps
they would be ok with it, since AFAICS ccat is just a convenience alias to
ccrypt --cat).
I don't think there is any other option, as ccat from ccrypt has a completely
different purpose, so you can't use alternatives or similar mechanism to deal
with the conflict.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
