https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(jama...@fc.up.pt) |
--- Comment #44 from José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #43)
>
> Please document the bundled dependencies and their versions and why, per the
> policy.
>
> Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling
> Cf.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle
>
> I would prefer to see tzlocal unbundled, though I can accept this upstream
> preferring otherwise as long as it is documented properly.
FWIW I agree with you and I intend to work on unbundling tzlocal, if possible
to have this work applied upstream.
The other module it is not in pypi and so not it causes less concern.
The new version with just that change is here:
Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec
SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola-8.0.4-6.fc32.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
