https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814887
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #4) > Apparently, "MIT" is unambiguously https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT. Yes, but in the world exists at least 30+ variations of MIT licenses. Better ask @spot about this :) > Do you think it's still required? I am upstream, fwiw. Yes. It should not be hard to put the full license text into LICENSE file and release new version, isn't it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
