Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543151 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2010-11-24 21:38:21 EST --- I see you commented on the invalid-soname rpmlint complaints, and I agree that they seem to be expected for erlang packages. But what about these: erlang-exmpp.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/erlang-exmpp-0.9.5/exmpp_xml.html And the 68 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints like: erlang-exmpp.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/exmpp-0.9.5/priv/lib/exmpp_stringprep.so driver_alloc (install the package and run "rpmlint erlang-exmpp" to see those) Knowing very little about erlang and nothing of how it usually does linkage, I don't know if those are expected or problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
