Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461 --- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2010-11-24 22:01:51 EST --- Now, for another dumb question: are the later sdk versions (920 seems to be current) something you'd also want to package? I guess the API changes with each version and packages need a specific version to build against, but I don't quite understand why version 465 gets to _the_ lzma-sdk package instead of being called lzma465-sdk or something. Otherwise I can't really argue with this package; of course rpmlint hates it because the package name doesn't end in -devel, but I do think this is at least better than bundling the actual source in various packages and fundamentally it isn't really any different than a static library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
