https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971



--- Comment #43 from David Cantrell <dcantr...@redhat.com> ---
Oh, and my Copr repo for rpminspect:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dcantrell/rpminspect/

These I find really handy because it gives bug reporters an easy way to "try
the latest build" and not have to compile and install themselves.  They can
enable Copr repos with dnf directly and away it goes.  Because rpm is deficient
with versioning and release numbers, it's best to munge the release value to
get what amounts to a timestamp so that "dnf upgrade" will pick up newer
builds.  Unless you're always revving the version number in your project, which
I assume you're not.

My continuous-goodies project has scripts to do that sort of junk.  You'll see.
 And also, if you have improvements for any of that junk, please share.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to