https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156



--- Comment #27 from Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Eric Sandeen from comment #25)
> If upstream is not building shared libraries or providing a stable API,
> Fedora should not try to do on its own.

Sound reasonable. Thanks.

Version 1.0.3 with no more libraries and license file in the main package.

Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/exfatprogs.spec
SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/exfatprogs-1.0.3-1.fc32.src.rpm


$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-32-x86_64/result/exfatprogs-1.0.3-1.fc32.*
exfatprogs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Userspace -> User space,
User-space, Users pace
exfatprogs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) exFAT -> ex Fat, expat, ex-fat
exfatprogs.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exFAT -> ex Fat, expat,
ex-fat
exfatprogs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Userspace -> User space,
User-space, Users pace
exfatprogs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) exFAT -> ex Fat, expat,
ex-fat
exfatprogs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exFAT -> ex Fat,
expat, ex-fat
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.


Now let's wait for the FE-LEGAL waiver.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to