Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #8 from Caius Chance <k...@fedoraproject.org> 2010-12-01 08:36:23 EST --- I support this. ibus-table-chinese as metapackage with ibus-table-* as subpackage is the best way I reckon. The reason for this is to minimize time of package maintenance. As there are more than 20 tables it is a disaster for the maintainer to keep them each in separated repository, except if they are all owned by someone who is not doing this as their work responsibilities. I am already the victim of that "packaging time-sucking disaster", sincerely I don't want Ding-Yi to suffer from the same consequence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
