Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620242 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2010-12-01 23:09:00 EST --- Builds OK; rpmlint says: python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: E: no-binary python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo-readstate python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ets_endo python-ETSDevTools-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package Are you sure this should be an arch-specific package? With a license tag that complicated, you definitely need to indicate which part of the package is under which license. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Nothing seems to own [...]/sitepackages/enthought -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
