Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649425

Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tcall...@redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |tcall...@redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> 2010-12-02 
11:16:37 EST ---
Review
=======
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
kaudiocreator.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kaudiocreator

Safe to ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on F-14 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- .desktop file OK

== Notes ==
* BuildRequires:  gtk2 seems wrong. I did a scratch build without it
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2639728) and it built fine
(as expected). You should remove it from your final package.

* %clean is unnecessary in active Fedora targets, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean (it is still
needed if you need this package for EPEL)
* BuildRoot is unnecessary in active Fedora targets, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag (it is still
needed if you need this package for EPEL)
* It is no longer necessary to delete the buildroot as the first step of
%install in active Fedora targets. It is still needed if you need this package
for EPEL.

These items are relatively minor, so I won't hold the review up on them.
APPROVED.

(If you could do a review on 656010, I would appreciate it, shouldn't be too
rough.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to