https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027



--- Comment #21 from Fabien Boucher <fbouc...@redhat.com> ---
Some Ansible modules have been modified to fit some security requirements of
Zuul. So yes this is intentional and part of the upstream Zuul project.

Should I set ?:

# The entire source code is ASL 2.0 except files under
/usr/lib/pythonX.X/site-packages/zuul/ansible which is GPLv3
License: ASL 2.0 And GPLv3

The provided Ansible files are modified by the Zuul maintainers. Thus I'm
wondering if it makes sense to include this information according to the
explanation here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle
"This allows us to search for packages that may be affected by bugs or security
issues in older versions of the library"

Provides: bundled(ansible) = 2.7
Provides: bundled(ansible) = 2.8
Provides: bundled(ansible) = 2.9

Let me know.

Thanks again for the help !


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to