https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992



--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth <mat.bo...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> Hm. Well, we could switch to shipping an older version of jsp-api for now
> (one that doesn't have the package name transition yet). According to an
> upstream developer, those latest "stable" releases aren't even meant for
> public consumption yet :(
> 

That might be the easiest thing to do. I suspect there won't be many
differences except the package name refactoring between the last 2.x.x release
and 3.0.0.


> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaf/issues/49
> 
> No idea why they're tagged as "x.0.0" releases in GitHub if they're not
> ready yet :D

I suppose they expect people to check maven central, the canonical distribution
method for java, where the github-tagged release is not yet available:
https://search.maven.org/artifact/jakarta.servlet.jsp/jakarta.servlet.jsp-api


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to