https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870208
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > BTW, I'd rather see requires such as 'libvips.so.42`, but they are not > properly required [1]. And it turns out, there is way to do it according to RPM upstream [1]: ~~~ Requires: (libvips.so.42()(64bit) if libc.so.6()(64bit)) Requires: (libvips.so.42 if libc.so.6) ~~~ Because this is Ruby package, we could possible use libruby.so instead. [1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1344#issuecomment-681916527 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
