https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878574
--- Comment #2 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tul...@ascii.art.br> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1) > [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. A patch has been submitted upstream: https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async/pull/133 > Try to ask upstream for a separate license file. > > [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. > Note: %define requiring justification: %define pkg async > > Use %global instead of %define here. Fixed. > - Patch these obsolete FSF address with the latest one and send it upstream > > emacs-async.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/async/async-bytecomp.el > emacs-async.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/async/async-test.el > emacs-async.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/async/async.el > emacs-async.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/async/dired-async.el > emacs-async.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/async/smtpmail-async.el Fixed. The new spec file is available here: https://pagure.io/emacs-async/blob/master/f/emacs-async.spec I've also requested the repository. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
