https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881782
Andy Mender <andymenderu...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Andy Mender <andymenderu...@gmail.com> ---
> # The entire source code is under GPLv2 except for accel-config
> # library which is mostly LGPLv2, ccan/list which is BSD-MIT and
> # the rest of ccan which is CC0.
> License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2 and BSD-MIT and CC0
Thanks for the extra comments. However, "BSD-MIT" is not a valid license tag.
I had a look at the BSD-MIT license file again and it's the Modern Style MIT
with sublicense:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT#Modern_Style_with_sublicense
So the License tag should look like this:
> License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2 and MIT and CC0
> Summary: Configuration library for accelerator subsystem devices
> # All source code of configuration library is LGPLv2, except
> # ccan/list which is BSD-MIT and the rest of ccan/ which is CC0.
> License: LGPLv2 and BSD-MIT and CC0
Same here, it should be:
> License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2 and MIT and CC0
The rest looks okay. Please, fix that on package import. Approved!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
