https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887037
José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |jama...@fc.up.pt
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |jama...@fc.up.pt
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> ---
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file follows the
Fedora package guidelines.
In this cases these are the fedora-review complaints:
Issues:
=======
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
So nothing to see here, please proceed.
The package is approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
