Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571416 --- Comment #12 from Karel Volný <kvo...@redhat.com> 2010-12-13 18:00:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > For FreeOrion :) well, in that case you should also include the cmake modules that FreeOrion uses ;-) --- GiGi.spec.atkac 2010-12-08 13:45:45.000000000 +0100 +++ GiGi.spec 2010-12-13 16:36:00.431559469 +0100 @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir}/GG/gen_signals.py +# add sources shared (used) by FreeOrion +mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/cmake/Modules +cp cmake/Config.cmake %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/cmake/Modules +cp cmake/Util.cmake %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/cmake/Modules + %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -65,6 +70,7 @@ %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_includedir}/* %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/* +%{_datadir}/cmake/Modules/* %changelog * Wed Dec 08 2010 Adam Tkac <atkac redhat com> 0.6.0-0.1.20101207svn903 (In reply to comment #11) > How does this version compare with the 0.7.0 version available for download > from the sourceforge site? I know this package contains an SVN checkout but > it > seems odd that the version is behind what's available for download. the problem is that the package is advertised as a newer version number, but the authors forgot to change it within the sources so that it identifies itself as the older version ... I see two solutions, one being used right now to keep consistency with what really is in the source, and the other to patch the sources to match the version written on the download page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
