https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697
--- Comment #31 from Jaya <jhutt...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #29) > jaya, the javadoc package works for you? Is it empty, does rpm with it even > exists? > it do nto work for me. If it do not work for you, then you hsould probably > remove all javadoc subpackage declarations. But of course it is always > better to generate it. javadoc related rpm is generated for me. I can see the below in my build output: ' ' ' Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/openjdk-asmtools-7.0.b10-pre.0.1.fc33.x86_64 Wrote: ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/openjdk-asmtools-7.0.b10-pre.0.1.fc33.noarch.rpm Wrote: ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/openjdk-asmtools-javadoc-7.0.b10-pre.0.1.fc33.noarch.rpm ' ' ' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
