Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert <cwick...@fedoraproject.org> 2010-12-20 03:49:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > I updated all "MUST FIX" issues into the spec file; rebuilt the source package > and then re-uploaded both onto the same location on FedoraPeople space. Whenever you make changes to a package, you must increase the release, even durign review. You should also note the changes you did in a changelog entry. > Please review the updates for me. Tell me anything I should do more. When you give me a -2 package, I will review the remaining points. (In reply to comment #4) > Btw, do I need to process "N/A" issues? Not Applicable = the guideline is does not meet this package, so you don't need to care about it here. (In reply to comment #5) > At this time, we should go ahead with F14, then I will follow up with upstream > for the next releases. I'm sorry, but this is not possible because we need a clean upgrade path. rawhide always needs to have the highest version, otherwise people cannot upgrade from F14 to rawhide. When you do an update or a new package, you first to it in rawhide, then in F14 and then F13. Maybe you can pick changes from SVN when they are available, but without rawhide I cannot accept the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
