https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956580

Xavier Bachelot <xav...@bachelot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xav...@bachelot.org
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |xav...@bachelot.org



--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot <xav...@bachelot.org> ---
Hi Dennis,

Quick review, based in part on what I've seen when trying to adapt the
openalchemist spec, like you did.
Excuse the rough list below, rather short on time to make it into a nicer shape
now.

Issues:
- File conflicts with openalchemist, it would be cleaner to use
%{datadir}/alchemyquest rather than %{datadir/openalchemist}, which needs to be
changed upstream.
- A lot of s/openalchemist/alchemyquest/ needs to be done in the spec.
- I think providing 2 .desktop files, icons, etc.., one for alchemyquest and
one for openalchemist, would help transitioning from openalchemist to
alchemyquest.
- If you add the /usr/bin/openalchemist symlink, missing Obsoletes/Provides for
openalchemist.

Minor nits:
- Indent on the BR: make (which comes from the openalchemist spec, I know ;-))
- Spurious wildcard in %files for appdata and desktop file (from openalchemist
too)
- Sort BR:

Regards,
Xavier


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to